January 2025

 

News

Utah Limits Nondisclosure and Non-disparagement Provisions in Certain Agreements

04/04/24

Author: ADP Admin/Tuesday, April 2, 2024/Categories: Compliance Corner , State Compliance Update, Utah

Utah has enacted legislation (House Bill 55), which restricts certain nondisclosure and non-disparagement clauses. House Bill 55 is effective immediately and retroactively applies to agreements that are entered into on or after Jan. 1, 2023.

The details

Restricted Agreements

House Bill 55 limits the terms of these agreements between an employer and an employee:

  • A nondisclosure agreement that prevents (or has an effect of preventing), an employee from disclosing, discussing, or alleging sexual assault or sexual harassment (misconduct).
  • A non-disparagement clause that prohibits (or has the effect of prohibiting), an employee from making a negative statement about the employer that is related to a claim or a dispute related to sexual misconduct.

House Bill 55

House Bill 55 expands the Utah Antidiscrimination Act to prohibit:

  • Nondisclosure or non-disparagement agreements regarding sexual misconduct which are required as a condition of employment. Such provisions are unenforceable under the law.
  • An employer from retaliating against a current or former employee that alleges sexual misconduct or refuses to enter into an agreement that is prohibited under House Bill 55.

The law also allows an employee to withdraw from a settlement agreement that contains a nondisclosure or non-disparagement confidentiality clause related to sexual misconduct, provided they withdraw within three days after entering such an agreement.

Exceptions

House Bill 55 does not prohibit:

  • An agreement between an employer and an employee that alleges sexual misconduct from containing a nondisclosure or non-disparagement clause (or any other clause) that prohibits the disclosure of:
  • An employer from requiring an employee to:
  • An employee from discussing sexual misconduct or allegations of sexual misconduct in a civil or criminal case when subpoenaed if the discussions are against the individual alleged to have engaged in the misconduct.

The law also does not:

  • Limit other reasons that may make a confidentiality clause unenforceable.
  • Permit a disclosure that would violate state or federal law; or
  • Authorize an employee to:

Next steps

Employers with operations in Utah should review applicable agreements and confidentiality provisions and consult legal counsel to help ensure compliance with House Bill 55.

 

Number of views (3581)/Comments (0)

What's New

Regional Alerts

Effective August 10, 2016, Colorado employers are no longer required to complete and retain the Colorado Affirmation Form, confirming that they have examined whether a new hire is authorized to work in the United States.

> Read more

New Hampshire recently enacted Senate Bill 416, which grants an employee the right to request (1) a flexible work arrangement that meets the needs of the employer and employee and (2) advance notice of his/her work schedule.  It also prohibits employers from retaliating against an employee ...

> Read more

The medical marijuana program established by New York’s Compassionate Care Act has been implemented.

> Read more

The Virginia state poster has been updated in regards to accident reporting. All injuries or illnesses that result in an in-patient hospitalization, amputation or loss of an eye must be reported to Virginia Occupational Safety and Health Program (VOSH) within 24 hours. This Virginia law has been ...

> Read more

 




 

© Copyright 2016 ADP LLC. 10200 Sunset Drive | Miami, FL 33173

The ADP logo, ADP, ADP TotalSource and a more human resource. are registered trademarks of ADP, LLC. All other trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners.