May 2025

 

News

Employee vs Independent Contractor: What You Don't Know Could Cost You

04/03/25

Author: ADP Admin/Monday, March 31, 2025/Categories: Bulletin News

When a worker qualifies as an independent contractor, the employer is generally relieved of obligations related to payroll taxes, minimum wage  in addition to overtime requirements, benefits, workers' compensation, and unemployment costs for that individual. However, only a small fraction of workers qualify for independent contractor status.

Independent contractors are generally in an independent trade or business and offer their services to the general public under a contract or agreement. Typically, they provide their own equipment and determine how and when they work. The more control that the business has over the individual, the more likely they will be considered an employee and not an independent contractor.

Many employers refer to independent contractors as "1099" workers and employees as "W-2" workers after the IRS forms used for federal reporting purposes. However, simply providing a worker a 1099 Form doesn't make them an independent contractor. The classification must always be made on the basis of whether the worker meets federal and state tests for independent contractor status. Different tests are used to determine whether a worker is covered by a particular law or benefit. The following is an overview of some of these tests.


Federal tests

Taxes


The Internal Revenue Service uses the Common Law Test for federal tax purposes. The test has three broad categories to determine the appropriate classification of a worker:

  • "Behavioral control" examines whether the company has the authority to direct and control the work of the service provider and looks at whether the worker receives training and instruction.

  • "Financial control" looks at factors such as whether the worker realizes a profit or loss, makes investments in tools and facilities, and has unreimbursed expenses.

  • "Type of relationship" examines the nature of the relationship. This includes whether there is a written contract between the parties, the permanency of the relationship, and whether the worker is entitled to employee-type benefits.

Under this test, no one factor stands alone in making a classification determination. You need to weigh all factors (and take into account any other applicable tests) when determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor. Look at the entire relationship, consider the degree of control, and document each of the factors used in making a determination.

When in doubt, it is a best practice to classify the worker as an employee. You may also request an official determination from the IRS using Form SS-8. However, it can take at least six months to get an IRS determination.

Wage and hour

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) uses an "economic realities" test to determine whether workers are considered employees and therefore covered by the FLSA[BR1]  and entitled to minimum wage, overtime, and other wage and hour protections.

Since March 11, 2024, the DOL’s economic realities test has looked at the following six factors. Additional factors that look closely at investments by the worker, the employer’s control, and whether the work performed is integral to the business may also be considered if the worker is in business for themself.


1. Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill

This factor considers whether the worker has opportunities for profit or loss based on managerial skill (including initiative or business acumen or judgment) that affect the worker's economic success or failure in performing the work. If a worker has no opportunity for a profit or loss, then this factor suggests that the worker is an employee. 


2. Investments by the worker and the employer

This factor considers whether any investments by a worker are capital or entrepreneurial in nature. Such investments generally support an independent business and serve a business-like function, such as increasing the worker's ability to do different types of or more work, reducing costs, or extending market reach. Additionally, the worker's investments should be considered on a relative basis with the potential employer's investments in its overall business.


3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship

This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an employee when the work relationship is indefinite in duration, continuous, or exclusive of work for other employers.

This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an independent contractor when the work relationship is definite in duration, non-exclusive, project-based, or sporadic based on the worker being in business for themself and marketing their services or labor to multiple entities.

4. Nature and degree of control

This factor considers the potential employer's control, including reserved control, over the performance of the work and the economic aspects of the working relationship.

Facts relevant to the potential employer's control over the worker include whether the potential employer sets the worker's schedule, supervises the performance of the work, or explicitly limits the worker's ability to work for others. Additionally, facts relevant to the potential employer's control over the worker include whether the potential employer uses technological means to supervise the performance of the work (such as by means of a device or electronically), reserves the right to supervise or discipline workers, or places demands or restrictions on workers that do not allow them to work for others or work when they choose.

5. Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business

This factor considers whether the work performed is an integral part of the potential employer’s business. This factor doesn’t depend on whether any individual worker in particular is an integral part of the business, but rather whether the function they perform is an integral part of the business.

This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an employee when the work they perform is critical,
necessary, or central to the potential employer's principal business. This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an independent contractor when the work they perform isn’t critical, necessary, or central to the potential employer's principal business.

6. Skill and initiative

This factor considers whether the worker uses specialized skills to perform the work and whether those skills contribute to business-like initiative. This factor indicates employee status where the worker does not use specialized skills in performing the work or where the worker is dependent on training from the potential employer to perform the work.


Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

Under federal nondiscrimination laws, a worker is presumed to be an employee (and therefore entitled to protection under EEO laws) unless they meet certain tests. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) looks at factors suggesting a worker is an employee and not an independent contractor, such as whether:

  • The employer has the right to control when, where, and how the worker performs the job.
  • The work doesn't require a high level of skill or expertise.
  • The employer furnishes the tools, materials, and equipment.
  • The work is performed on the employer's premises.
  • There is a continuing relationship between the worker and the employer.
  • The employer has the right to assign additional projects to the worker.
  • The employer sets the hours of work and the duration of the job.
  • The worker is paid by the hour, week, or month rather than the agreed cost of performing a particular job.
  • The worker does not hire and pay assistants.
  • The work performed by the worker is part of the regular business of the employer.
  • The worker is not engaged in their own distinct occupation or business.
  • The employer provides the worker with benefits such as insurance, leave, or workers' compensation.
  • The worker is considered an employee of the employer for tax purposes (i.e., the employer withholds federal, state, and Social Security taxes).
  • The employer can discharge the worker.
  • The worker and the employer believe that they are creating an employer-employee relationship.

 

 

State tests

Some states have their own tests-- some of which are more difficult to satisfy than federal tests. For example, a number of states use the “ABC test” for determining whether an individual is covered under unemployment insurance and/or wage and hour laws or other benefits. Under this test, a worker must be considered an employee unless all three of the following factors are met:

  • The worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact;
  • The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business; and
  • The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity.

Check your applicable state tests to ensure compliance.


In Conclusion

Before classifying an individual as an independent contractor, make sure they've met all applicable tests. Misclassification of employees as independent contractors can result in significant penalties. If the worker fails to meet these tests, the individual is an employee and is entitled to all the rights and benefits of employees under the applicable law.

Number of views (1339)/Comments (0)

Tags: 04/03/25

Regional Alerts

This article is a reminder of various laws that were passed or will be effective in 2019.  This list is a summary and includes laws that will also be effective at later dates as noted in the article. 

> Read more

The California Pay Equity Task Force (“Task Force”) has released written guidance for employees, employers and unions on how they may comply with the California Fair Pay Act (“CFPA”).

> Read more

California enacted Senate Bill 970 establishing a minimum threshold for human trafficking awareness training and education in the hospitality industry.

> Read more

In Illinois, the Village of Northbrook and the Village of Wilmette governments have now voted to opt back into the Cook County Earned Sick Leave Ordinance (“Ordinance”). 

> Read more

Illinois has enacted legislation (House Bill 4743) that will expand the state’s Equal Pay Act to expressly prohibit pay differentials between African American employees and other employees. Previously, the Illinois Equal Pay Act prohibited pay differentials based on sex only.

> Read more

Effective January 1, 2019, the rights of Illinois employees serving in the military will be governed by the Illinois Service Member Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (ISERRA), Public Act 100-1101. 

> Read more

New Illinois Human Rights Act posting and handbook requirements extend to all employers operating in the state of Illinois.

> Read more

Maine law requires employers to annually provide their employees with notice of the employer’s sexual harassment policy. The employer’s policy must contain, for example, the definition of harassment (with examples), the employer’s internal complaint mechanism, the Maine Human ...

> Read more

The newly created Department of Family and Medical Leave has launched a website that includes guidance for employers, including answers to frequently asked questions by employers and frequently asked questions by employees.

> Read more

In Massachusetts, the law requires employers to adopt a written policy against sexual harassment. The policy must include, for example, notice to employees that sexual harassment in the workplace is unlawful and that it is unlawful to retaliate against an employee for filing a complaint of ...

> Read more

The Michigan Legislature has adopted two pieces of legislation (Senate Bill 1171 and Senate Bill 1175) that will scale back increases to the minimum wage and require certain employers to provide paid sick leave (and now call it paid medical leave).

> Read more

We would like to remind New Jersey clients of their obligation to annually distribute to their New Jersey employees the required CEPA and Gender Inequity notices. 

> Read more

On December 7, 2018, New York Governor Cuomo signed into law bill A10615 immediately extending for eight years the 2012 amendments to New York Labor Law 193 that permit employers to make deductions from wages for items such as overpayments and advances against wages, subject to certain ...

> Read more

New York’s laws regarding organ and tissue donation have been amended. The law prohibits insurers from discriminating in life, accident, and health insurance based on a person’s status as a living organ or tissue donor. In addition, the law authorizes the use of paid family leave ...

> Read more

Joining New York City, Albany County, and Westchester County, Suffolk County has become the latest jurisdiction in New York to pass a bill that prevents employers from inquiring into the salary and benefits history of job applicants.

> Read more

A majority of the provisions of Oregon’s Equal Pay Act will go into effect on January 1, 2019. The Act’s ban on salary history inquiries went into effect in October 2017. Beginning the effective date, the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) will enforce the Act, including the ...

> Read more

The Austin-based 3rd Court of Appeals declared Austin’s paid sick and safe leave ordinance unconstitutional. 

> Read more

 

© Copyright 2025 ADP LLC. 10200 Sunset Drive | Miami, FL 33173

ADP, the ADP logo, and Always Designing for People are trademarks of ADP, Inc. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright © 2025 ADP, Inc.